Might I ask…why?

The modern technical definition of evolution is “change in allele frequency in a population over time”. In layman’s terms, it defines evolution as genetic change in a population.

Then we have subsets:
Natural selection = differential propagation of genotypes (due to differences in ability to survive, resist disease, find mates, etc)

Sexual selection = differential success in acquiring fertilizations between genotypes (a sub-set of natural selection)

Genetic drift = the effects of random chance on evolution, mostly seen in small populations and on genes with low frequency

Founder effect / genetic bottleneck = the isolation of a small random or nearly-random sub-set of a population, resulting in alterations in gene frequency due to chance.

There are two “theistic forms” of evolution:

deux ex machina: evolution exists/happens, but is guided by god. This is a very slightly different version of evolutionary theory, but scientifically there is no reason why it couldn’t be the case.
——>It works like thus: imagine a dice is rolled. Whatever the outcome is, it will be unlikely. For example, if a three is rolled, there will only have been a 1/6 chance that that would happen — ie, more likely than not that a three would not be rolled. Yet we accept the outcome as normal, aware that, unlikely as getting a three was, whichever outcome happened would be unlikely and so the unlikeliness itself is no reason to question its occurrence.

However, of all those outcomes, is it not possible that god caused the three to occur? Yup.

If the dice were rolled over and over again, then the high frequency of occurrence of the number three would tip us off as to something peculiar happening, but with just the one occurrence, gods’ interference would leave absolutely no indications that things were being tinkered with.

The implications of this are as thus: the evolution of any given body-plan (including humans) by a process of natural selection acting upon random mutations is slim. Yet humans evolved with exactly this body plan. Are we surprised that we evolved to this plan, when the chances of us possessing this plan were so slim?

deux in machina: The belief that all of the natural laws (including the ones that evolution follows) are created and upheld by a deity, whose essence basically keeps the universe ‘ticking over’.

So…I assume many already know this (those that have taken the time to study bio before embracing evoltuion anyways). My question is knowing this, how cna you continue to say that evolution is incompatible with any form of religious thinking?
To all atheists:
I am NOT trying to disprove evolution. Just read the last paragraph where I ask my question before ranting and lets have some of that intellectual exchange you all claim to want.