Do you think this is true? This is someone’s view on the beginning and end of the universe?
There are actually two types of nothing.
There is an eternal nothing and a finite nothing.
The universe or anything that goes on in it is an incident,an incident has a beginning and an end.
A slug,an elephant or you has a beginning and an end.
your beginning is,sort of obvious,it came from a potential.
Your end is the end of an incident it will never happen again,it is eternal.
The universe had a beginning and it will end and never happen again,it will enter a state of eternal nothing.
Before the universe began,there was nothing,but there had to be a potential and the potential had to be finite. If it was not finite it could not have changed.
Some way a space-time pulse was initiated a fraction of a second after time zero.
This space-time pulse matured and produced us and the universe that we experience to-day.
what do you guys think of this?
That the plane of existance, time, movement , space, all had a beginning, (from nothingness) and will eventually have an end, turn back into nothingness.. and stay nothingness… forever
your thoughts?

August 27th, 2011 at 7:36 pm
I believe that the Universe has started and ended “Infinite” times. Its just a forever process of everything and nothing.
WOW it makes no sense, but it sounds good to me…
HoustonTexans.com
Report this comment
August 31st, 2011 at 6:37 pm
Well it is hard to say when they have pretty much NOTHING on their mind.
HoustonTexans.com
Report this comment
September 4th, 2011 at 7:36 pm
dude, i am totally lost
HoustonTexans.com
Report this comment
September 9th, 2011 at 12:37 am
Word salad…yummy!
HoustonTexans.com
Report this comment
September 13th, 2011 at 10:37 am
I agree. But I think the ending is thousands, if not millions of years in the future.
HoustonTexans.com
Report this comment
September 17th, 2011 at 10:36 pm
I think we cannot know what was before the beginning or what will be after the end of the universe. If we could know then that would be part of the universe.
HoustonTexans.com
Report this comment
September 22nd, 2011 at 6:36 pm
Are you actually saying that the universe sprang spontaneously from nothing on its own? Ludicrous!
HoustonTexans.com
Report this comment
September 27th, 2011 at 9:36 pm
no its wrong..some things the human brain cannot comprehend like when Chernobyl the nuclear power plant melted. the people there that were running the show could not comprehend that it was serious..the human brain cannot comprehend..they kept saying its OK when in fact the core had melted..it wasn’t a cover up it was the fact that the human brain cannot comprehend..if you get the gist of this then try to imagine that space has no beginning as it was always there with stuff in it and it will always be there with stuff in it and lots of things in it will happen lots of times an some stuff will happen never but it will always be happening and always has been. you think this is not possible.but really its just the quantum physics of the situation..your brain is not designed to or just cannot comprehend so don’t try to understand it as you are not supposed to ..just to know that idea and leave it at that is enough.
HoustonTexans.com
Report this comment
October 3rd, 2011 at 3:37 am
You give a humans birth as an example of a finite nothing and eternal nothing, right?
Before birth, we are a “finite nothing” and after death we are an “eternal nothing” ? This doesn’t seem quite true….
Because, our parents manufactured the means to create us..therefore the potential for us to be born was not from us, but from them..
Using this analogy, if the universe were a finite nothing, it could not contain the potential in itself, but it came from somewhere.
This potential could have come from some “being” (if you believe in that sort of thing)… or it could have come from the “end” of another universe. Thus, when this universe ends, that energy would have to go somewhere.. possibly into another universe…
I don’t know.. hard to think about.
HoustonTexans.com
Report this comment
October 8th, 2011 at 7:36 am
I’ll be honest here. What the fudge cycle was that? The writing itself was a mix and mash of…, nothing comprehensible. It appears to be nothing about nothing.
Non the less I get a small glimmer of whats trying to be said.., and that is just totally … wrong… as in filled with error. But you’re welcome to your own opinion. No one will shoot you over it. Or lets hope not anyway.
HoustonTexans.com
Report this comment
October 13th, 2011 at 2:36 pm
i think it is true that the universe had a beginning and will have an end. all things that exist require a beginning. if something has no beginning, it does not exist. but before making a conclusion remember to ask yourself if you are using inductive reasoning or deductive reasoning. =)
HoustonTexans.com
Report this comment
October 18th, 2011 at 11:36 pm
Sounds more like someone’s attempt at exitential poetry. In which case, it sucks, but I don’t like poetry anyway.
If it’s not poetry, it doesn’t make any sense.
HoustonTexans.com
Report this comment
October 24th, 2011 at 1:36 pm
this is a Q & A forum, not designed to start philosophical discussions.
HoustonTexans.com
Report this comment
October 29th, 2011 at 6:36 pm
I would say :It sums up the universe[a nut shell would be plagiaristic] to a tee!
HoustonTexans.com
Report this comment
November 3rd, 2011 at 8:37 am
Poetic…But false. The universe has no end, just an extremely queer (messed up, not homosexual) bend. It’s really weird. But there is not nothingness, sorry. But it was a lovely poem.
HoustonTexans.com
Report this comment